← All Tools
LangChain VS LangGraph

LangChain vs LangGraph

LangChain and LangGraph are from the same company (LangChain Inc) but solve different problems. LangChain provides chains, agents, and tools for building LLM applications. LangGraph is a newer framework built on top of LangChain specifically for building stateful, multi-step agentic workflows using a graph-based state machine model. They are complementary, not competing.

🗓 Updated: ⭐ LangChain: 136k+ stars ⭐ LangGraph: 32k+ stars

⚡ TL;DR — 30-Second Verdict

Use LangChain for standard LLM chains, RAG pipelines, and simple agents. Use LangGraph when you need complex multi-step agents with persistent state, branching logic, human-in-the-loop, or multi-agent coordination. Most serious agentic applications should start with LangChain and graduate to LangGraph when they need stateful orchestration. They work best together.

Quick Comparison

Feature LangChain LangGraph
Purpose General LLM app framework Stateful agentic workflows
Architecture Chains, LCEL pipelines Graph nodes + edges + state
State management Limited (session-level) First-class persistent state
Human-in-the-loop Basic interrupt support Native breakpoints + resume
Multi-agent Basic agent routing Full supervisor/subgraph patterns
Learning curve Moderate Steeper (graph mental model)
Maturity Mature, stable API Newer, rapidly evolving

What Is LangChain?

LangChain is the most widely used LLM application framework, which means the most tutorials, community answers, and third-party integrations. That said, the abstraction layer can feel excessive for simple use cases. My recommendation: use LangChain when you need its integrations (150+ vector stores, document loaders, tools) or when team familiarity matters. For simple chains, LangGraph or even raw API calls are often cleaner.

— AI Nav Editorial Team on LangChain

→ Read the full LangChain review

What Is LangGraph?

LangGraph has found solid traction with 10k+ GitHub stars, indicating real-world adoption beyond early adopters. A useful framework for automating multi-step tasks that would otherwise require manual coordination. Set realistic expectations: autonomous agents work well on well-defined tasks with clear success criteria, and struggle with ambiguous goals. Always run with budget limits set.

— AI Nav Editorial Team on LangGraph

→ Read the full LangGraph review

When to Choose Each

Choose LangChain if…

Choose LangGraph if…

Frequently Asked Questions